No. 81778 - Published 18 Apr 2008
Review of Gena of Gena, South East Hants Berks Surrey
Details of Visit
Author: | puntertim |
---|---|
Type of Visit: | Incall |
Date and Time of Visit: | Thu 17 Apr 2008 0830 |
Duration of Visit: | 30 |
Amount Paid: | 120 |
Recommended: | No |
Details of Service Provider
Profile Name: | Gena - click to view profile in a new window |
Phone: | 07515562730 |
The Premises
Brand new block of flats - most of them empty I think. Easy parking -very safe
The Lady
Same as the photo's. I though she was very attractive physically, nice firm small breasts, very nice pussy, slim.
The Story
I had been poring over Gena's Punternet reports and photos for some time. I couldn't reconcile the very raunchy tone of her site with her performance in the videos - which seemed a bit detached.
For some reason though I felt drawn to seeing Gena to find out for myself which was real.
Let me caveat first; I didn't confirm with Gena until very late so this wasn't a long standing arrangement but she did say the time (0830) was OK - she did however when we arranged the meeting offer it at a reduction on her hourly rate.
The experience left me wanting; a lot of the dirty talk felt forced and she clearly wasn't 'into' what we were doing. The oral sex was good, don't get me wrong, and she has a nice tight puss and she is up for pretty much anything (although she said she'd have to charge me 'a lot more' for anal - which I thought was all included), but I got the impression she was rushed, and because I had nowhere near the hour she said she'd give me extra time next time, but I don;t sure I want a next time, I wanted 1 hour then, not 90 mins later.
So now I have had the gena experience; summary? Good for PSE, but I prefer GFE. Was it awful? no, would I go back?, no
For some reason though I felt drawn to seeing Gena to find out for myself which was real.
Let me caveat first; I didn't confirm with Gena until very late so this wasn't a long standing arrangement but she did say the time (0830) was OK - she did however when we arranged the meeting offer it at a reduction on her hourly rate.
The experience left me wanting; a lot of the dirty talk felt forced and she clearly wasn't 'into' what we were doing. The oral sex was good, don't get me wrong, and she has a nice tight puss and she is up for pretty much anything (although she said she'd have to charge me 'a lot more' for anal - which I thought was all included), but I got the impression she was rushed, and because I had nowhere near the hour she said she'd give me extra time next time, but I don;t sure I want a next time, I wanted 1 hour then, not 90 mins later.
So now I have had the gena experience; summary? Good for PSE, but I prefer GFE. Was it awful? no, would I go back?, no
This Lady's Reviews
Number | Author | Published | Recommended |
---|---|---|---|
120368 | kayak | 28 Jun 2015 | NO |
109570 | markhv | 26 Jun 2012 | YES |
95463 | hf5069 | 18 Jan 2010 | YES |
90957 | josoap | 4 Jun 2009 | YES |
86880 | Docpaul | 8 Dec 2008 | YES |
83614 | kingsman | 17 Jul 2008 | YES |
83096 | tricksimon | 22 Jun 2008 | NO |
83082 | tonka666 | 20 Jun 2008 | YES |
81778 | puntertim | 18 Apr 2008 | NO |
71285 | braders69 | 5 Feb 2007 | NO |
68110 | tysimojalaska | 8 Oct 2006 | YES |
67953 | HampshireBoyRacer | 4 Oct 2006 | YES |
67242 | bad_hobbit | 3 Sep 2006 | NO |
63449 | gedanon | 17 Apr 2006 | YES |
63312 | LickOrSuck | 12 Apr 2006 | YES |
62515 | baszzer | 15 Mar 2006 | YES |
Total Reviews: 16
Recommended: 11, 68.8%
Not Recommended: 5, 31.3%
Neutral: 0, 0%
NOTE: This list consists only of reviews linked to this profile and where the lady's name matches exactly. Reviews in which her name is spelled differently, or duo reviews with another lady, will not appear in this list. If two different ladies have worked under the same name at different times the results will still show all reviews where the name matches.
Watch Local Girls Live on Cam