No. 80902 - Published 11 Mar 2008
Review of Anjali of Indian Palace, London
Details of Visit
Author: | simpledan2008 |
---|---|
Type of Visit: | Incall |
Date and Time of Visit: | Sat 19 Jan 2008 15.00 |
Duration of Visit: | 30 |
Amount Paid: | 60 |
Recommended: | Yes |
Details of Service Provider
Profile Name: | Indian Palace - click to view profile in a new window |
Website: | http://www.indian-palace.com/ |
Phone: | 02070001908 |
The Premises
Nice clean place. Near the station, Very crowded area. No one will notice you as everyones busy going thier own ways.
The Lady
nice skin colour, firm chest and nice bottom. Very good looking lady.
The Story
Please note: i visted many weeks back and can not recall the exact date or day, sorry.
Met anjali and told her my requests. Most of them were refused on the basis: the house rules do not permit this and we practise sex safely etc.
Was very disapponited in the refusals but still went ahead with the normal personal service- which was quite good. She was responsive and friendly to speak to. overall a good personal service and anjali is a charm to be with.
Pros: The maid is friendly and was made to feel very welcomed.
Anjali was very nicely dressed in a hot bra/thong set
Nice location and very, very clean in every single room- even the bathroom is shiny as pearls and the towels are plentyfull and freshly washed.
A mirror is in the room (alotough a bigger mirror would help)
Nice touch lamps and music add to the mood ( Abit too dark for some maybe, but fine for me)
Cons: No CIM, No anal. No COF. No hardsports. No Reverse Oral. No French kissing, No OWO and No other hard fetishes are on offer.
Overall, a nice punt but the fact that the place does not offer CIM, Cum on face, and strictly NO anal. These 3 declines were a big turn off for me. The price is high (yet reasonable) - even if anal is not on the menu i would still expect cim and cum on face to be offered. I agree with safe sex but I think this place take safe sex tooo seriously- which is a good thing but dismissing cim and cum on face was a very big turn off for me.
The only and only reason i did not return becuase there is no cim or cum on face-other then that its a good punt
Met anjali and told her my requests. Most of them were refused on the basis: the house rules do not permit this and we practise sex safely etc.
Was very disapponited in the refusals but still went ahead with the normal personal service- which was quite good. She was responsive and friendly to speak to. overall a good personal service and anjali is a charm to be with.
Pros: The maid is friendly and was made to feel very welcomed.
Anjali was very nicely dressed in a hot bra/thong set
Nice location and very, very clean in every single room- even the bathroom is shiny as pearls and the towels are plentyfull and freshly washed.
A mirror is in the room (alotough a bigger mirror would help)
Nice touch lamps and music add to the mood ( Abit too dark for some maybe, but fine for me)
Cons: No CIM, No anal. No COF. No hardsports. No Reverse Oral. No French kissing, No OWO and No other hard fetishes are on offer.
Overall, a nice punt but the fact that the place does not offer CIM, Cum on face, and strictly NO anal. These 3 declines were a big turn off for me. The price is high (yet reasonable) - even if anal is not on the menu i would still expect cim and cum on face to be offered. I agree with safe sex but I think this place take safe sex tooo seriously- which is a good thing but dismissing cim and cum on face was a very big turn off for me.
The only and only reason i did not return becuase there is no cim or cum on face-other then that its a good punt
This Lady's Reviews
Number | Author | Published | Recommended |
---|---|---|---|
80902 | simpledan2008 | 11 Mar 2008 | YES |
79630 | harry007 | 15 Jan 2008 | NO |
76648 | GilmourD | 5 Sep 2007 | YES |
76531 | out of towner | 2 Sep 2007 | YES |
74156 | topman2006 | 29 May 2007 | YES |
66254 | Jayden | 30 Jul 2006 | YES |
65905 | LickKing | 18 Jul 2006 | YES |
65105 | earlgreyman | 18 Jun 2006 | YES |
63133 | indianlover | 6 Apr 2006 | YES |
Total Reviews: 9
Recommended: 8, 88.9%
Not Recommended: 1, 11.1%
Neutral: 0, 0%
NOTE: This list consists only of reviews linked to this profile and where the lady's name matches exactly. Reviews in which her name is spelled differently, or duo reviews with another lady, will not appear in this list. If two different ladies have worked under the same name at different times the results will still show all reviews where the name matches.
Watch Local Girls Live on Cam